Alternative test better at finding potentially dangerous holes in the heart

American Stroke Association Meeting Late-Breaking Science Report Abstract: LB10 (Hall E)

February 14, 2014 Categories: Scientific Conferences & Meetings, Stroke News

Study Highlights:

  • Transcranial Doppler testing — an inexpensive ultrasound tool for assessing the arteries inside the head — may be more sensitive than a standard technique for finding dangerous holes in the heart that might underlie some patients’ strokes.
  • The standard test — echocardiography — didn’t find such heart defects in about 15 percent of stroke patients who had them.
Embargoed until Noon PT/ 3 p.m. ET, Friday, Feb. 14, 2014
This news release is featured in an Embargoed News Briefing at 8 a.m. PT Friday, Feb. 14

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 14, 2014 — An alternative test for measuring blood flow to the brain detected a potentially dangerous hole within the heart of some patients with an unexplained stroke better than a standard test, according to late-breaking science presented at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference 2014.

In addition, the transcranial Doppler test could differentiate the risk of future stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) as related to the severity of the defect.

An echocardiogram uses ultrasound to see if bubbles injected in a vein have flowed from the right side of the heart to the left side (through the top chambers of the heart called the atria), while the trancranial Doppler detects the bubbles in the brain arteries, said J. David Spence, M.D., senior researcher for the study and director of the Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute at Western University in London, Ontario, Canada.

Previous research indicates that 25 percent of the population, and a higher percentage of patients who have had unexplained strokes, have a patent foramen ovale (PFO), which occurs when an opening between two heart chambers fails to close at birth. Many people never have symptoms. However, such a hole, or “shunt,” can allow a blood clot that forms in a vein to escape from the right to the left side of the heart, enter the arteries to the brain and cause a stroke (paradoxical embolism).

Researchers tested whether PFOs already detected by transcranial Doppler would also be found by transesophageal echocardiography, a widely used approach.

Echocardiography — which included contrast dye before saline bubbles were injected — failed to find the PFO in more than 15 percent of the 340 patients in the study with the defect, the researchers reported.

Researchers did not investigate whether transcranial doppler detected all such defects in patients with PFO found by echocardiogram.

 “Surprisingly, some of those shunts were quite large,” Spence said — about one-quarter of the missed defects were in the three highest grades of severity, according to a five-grade measure.

Accurately detecting PFOs, and knowing its grade, can help doctors decide whether a stroke was due to a paradoxical embolism, Spence said. Other clues related to the patient’s stroke are also helpful, including shortness of breath at stroke onset; sitting for a long time, such as on an airplane; waking up with a stroke; and having a history of migraine, sleep apnea, deep vein thrombosis, varicose veins or pulmonary embolism.

Diagnosing the underlying cause of a stroke is essential to choosing the right medicine to help prevent future strokes, Spence said. Anticoagulant drugs are three times more effective than another commonly used class of drugs, known as antiplatelet agents, in preventing the type of stroke that can be caused by a clot passing through a PFO, he said.

The study’s findings may also be important in understanding which patients with PFO might benefit from closing the hole surgically or with a catheter-deployed device. PFO is present in about one-quarter of the population but accounts for only about 5.5 percent of strokes caused by paradoxical embolism. This suggests the defect isn’t a problem in about 80 percent of patients with it, Spence said. “That’s why these clinical clues are so important,” he said.

Compared with echocardiography, the cost of transcranial doppler equipment is about one-fifth that of a modern echocardiogram machine; heavy sedation is not used as it typically is with transesophageal echocardiogram; and transcranial Doppler is helpful for other purposes, such as learning which patients with asymptomatic narrowing of the carotid artery may warrant surgery. “More stroke centers should be doing transcranial Doppler,” Spence said.

Co-authors are Joshua Tobe, B.Sc.; Chrysi Bogiatzi, M.D.; Claudio Munoz, M.D., Ph.D.; and Arturo Tamayo, M.D. Author disclosures are on the abstract.

Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada (Ontario) and donations to the Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre funded the study.

Statements and conclusions of study authors that are presented at American Stroke Association scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect association policy or position.  =The association makes no representation or warranty as to their accuracy or reliability. The association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific association programs and events.  The association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content.  =Revenues from pharmaceutical and device corporations are available at www.heart.org/corporatefunding.

###

Note: Actual presentation is 12:23 p.m. PT, Friday, Feb. 14, 2014 in Hall E.

ASA News Media in Dallas: (214) 706-1173
ASA News Media Office, Feb. 11-14, 2014,
at the San Diego Convention Center: (619) 525-6204
For Public Inquiries: (800) AHA-USA1 (242-8721)

 


  • Share