Radiation risks should be considered and discussed before heart imaging
American Heart Association Scientific Statement
- Patients should have a clear understanding of why their healthcare provider has recommended a heart imaging test and the potential benefits and risks of the test, including risks related to radiation exposure.
- Healthcare providers should understand the radiation risks of various tests and consider this risk when deciding to recommend the use of cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation.
Embargoed until 3 p.m. CT / 4 p.m. ET Monday, Sept. 29, 2014
DALLAS, Sept. 29, 2014 — Before undergoing heart imaging procedures involving radiation,
healthcare providers should help patients understand why the procedure is needed and its potential benefits and risks, including risks related to radiation exposure, according to a new scientific statement in the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation.
“With technological improvements, medical imaging has become an increasingly vital tool in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease, but the rising use of the tests has led to increasing radiation exposure over the past two decades,” said Reza Fazel, M.D., M.Sc., chair of the writing committee for the statement and cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “Heart imaging procedures account for almost 40 percent of the radiation exposure from medical imaging.”
Effective communication between patients and healthcare providers is important, especially among patients who may have an overstated fear of radiation. The statement recommends that before moving forward with an imaging test that uses radiation, clinicians should initiate a discussion with patients to address their questions and concerns, and openly discuss questions such as:
- How will the test help diagnose or treat your my heart problem?
- Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation?
- How much radiation will you be exposed to?
- How could that affect your chance of developing cancer later in life, and how does that compare to the risk from other common activities?
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” Fazel said.
With the exception of mammography, there is no federal regulation of radiation dose for medical tests, leaving the appropriate use of heart imaging in the hands of clinicians and imaging facilities. In 2009, the American Heart Association called for judicious use of the tests and gave general recommendations for their use. The current statement builds on that advisory by providing practical recommendations for enhancing radiation safety in heart imaging.
The new statement also provides guidance for training professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests.
According to the statement, clinicians ordering imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Fazel said.
In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, availability, cost, and convenience.
The most commonly used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac CT (computed tomography) scans, and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography (ultrasound imaging of the heart) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
Professionals who perform cardiac imaging should have adequate knowledge of contemporary methods of optimizing radiation exposure, which means imaging with the dose of radiation required to obtain high-quality images using best available methods and not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Co-authors are Thomas C. Gerber, M.D., Ph.D., co-chair; Stephen Balter, Ph.D.; David J. Brenner, D.Sc.; J. Jeffrey Carr, M.D., M.S.C.E.; Manuel D. Cerqueira, M.D.; Jersey Chen, M.D., M.P.H.; Andrew J. Einstein, M.D., Ph.D.; Harlan M. Krumholz, M.D., S.M.; Mahadevappa Mahesh, M.S., Ph.D.; Cynthia H. McCollough, Ph.D.; James K. Min, M.D.; Richard L. Morin, Ph.D.; Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, M.D., M.P.H.; Khurram Nasir, M.D., M.P.H.; Rita F. Redberg, M.D., M.Sc.; and Leslee J. Shaw, Ph.D., on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention.
Author disclosures are on the statement.
- Beating Heart Animation and heart illustrations are available on the right column of this news release link: http://newsroom.heart.org/news/radiation-risks-should-be-considered-and-discussed-before-heart-imaging?preview=1fce2b9cd27a15618b3bf092e1c786bb
- Children and heart tests that use radiation
- Heart disease and stroke information
- Follow AHA/ASA news on Twitter @HeartNews.
- For updates and new science from the Circulation journal follow @CircAHA.
Life is why we fund scientific breakthroughs that save and improve lives.