Disparities in stroke care at urban vs. rural hospitals impacts quality of care, patient survival
- Stroke patients in rural areas are less likely to get the most advanced treatments and are more likely to die before leaving the hospital than people treated for stroke at hospitals in urban areas.
- Between 2012 and 2017, there was no improvement in rural/urban disparities in stroke treatments and outcomes.
Embargoed until 4 a.m. CT/5 a.m. ET Thursday, June 18, 2020
DALLAS, June 18, 2020 — People living in rural areas are less likely to get the most advanced treatments for stroke and are more likely to die in the hospital than those treated for stroke at hospitals in urban areas, according to new research published today in Stroke, a journal of the American Stroke Association, a division of the American Heart Association.
“There are so many challenges facing rural America right now – higher rates of chronic disease, poverty and joblessness – and cardiovascular and other health outcomes are much worse in rural areas. This study shines light on one area where changes in care, such as the introduction of telehealth or other programs, could really make a difference,” said Karen E. Joynt Maddox, M.D., M.P.H., senior author of the study and assistant professor of medicine at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri.
Researchers examined national data on more than 790,000 adults (the majority over age 64, 53% female) hospitalized with stroke between 2012-2017, from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest publicly available, all-payer inpatient health care database in the U.S. Compared with patients living in urban areas, stroke patients treated at rural hospitals were:
- about half as likely to receive clot-busting medication (such as intravenous alteplase) to treat clot-caused strokes;
- about one-third less likely to undergo a procedure (such as an endovascular thrombectomy) to remove a stroke-causing clot; and
- more likely to die of any type of stroke before leaving the hospital (6.87% vs 5.82%), with no improvement in the rural-urban disparity over the 5-year period.
“The magnitude of the differences in risk of death and the lack of improvement over time were striking. One would think that recent improvements in technology and in telehealth would mean that we could, as a system, deliver optimal care no matter where people live. That turns out to not yet be the case for stroke care,” Joynt Maddox said.
As well as their lack of access to advanced therapies, rural patients also had significantly lower rates of access to specialists.
“The lack of access to specialists is often a limiting factor in adequate care for rural stroke patients, and in this case, that could mean a neurologist to guide the initial care, an interventional neurologist or radiologist to do a procedure, or having a neurosurgeon available for backup in case of any complications,” said Gmerice Hammond, M.D., M.P.H., first author of the study and a cardiology fellow at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. “Clinicians need to work to improve access to high-quality stroke care for individuals in rural areas. That means partnerships between hospitals for rapid transfer, as well as telehealth when appropriate. And clinical leaders and policymakers should prioritize improving access, care and outcomes for stroke in rural communities.”
Meanwhile, residents in rural areas can take steps to protect themselves. “Be aware of signs and symptoms of stroke, and seek care urgently if any symptoms develop. To the extent possible, be as aggressive as you can with preventive efforts like blood pressure control. The best way to survive a stroke is to not have one in the first place,” Hammond said.
According to the American Stroke Association, the most common symptoms of stroke are known as F.A.S.T., face drooping, arm weakness, speech and time to call 9-1-1. Bystanders should call 911 for immediate help even if the symptoms go away.
The study was limited in not having information on the severity of stroke or on factors that determine who is eligible for advanced therapies (such as the size of clot, where it is located, and the length of time between the onset of stroke and the patient arriving at the hospital).
“Future studies using more detailed clinical data will be important to follow up on our findings and to determine why patients in rural areas aren’t receiving advanced therapies. Is it because their stroke severity is different? Or because delays in getting to the hospital meant they weren’t eligible by the time they arrived? Those questions can’t be answered with administrative data, but they’re very important to look into so that we can develop effective solutions,” Joynt Maddox said.
Other co-authors are Alina A. Luke, M.P.H.; Lauren Elson, B.A.; and Amytis Towfighi, M.D.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health funded the study.
- Available multimedia is on right column of release link: https://newsroom.heart.org/news/disparities-in-stroke-care-at-urban-vs-rural-hospitals-impacts-quality-of-care-patient-survival?preview=75895080857aad9a73218e8d0cdc4929
- After June 18, view the manuscript online.
- Joint statement on health equity, social justice and civil unrest from the Association of Black Cardiologists, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology
- American Heart Association issues call to action for addressing inequities in rural health
- Interim guidance issued on stroke care during COVID-19 pandemic
- F.A.S.T. – Stroke Warning Signs
- Twenty things you didn’t know about stroke, that may save a life
- Follow AHA/ASA news on Twitter @HeartNews
- Follow news from Stroke, the ASA/AHA journal @StrokeAHA_ASA
Statements and conclusions of study authors published in American Heart Association scientific journals are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association’s policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and device corporations and health insurance providers are available at https://www.heart.org/en/about-us/aha-financial-information.
About the American Stroke Association
The American Stroke Association is devoted to saving people from stroke — the No. 2 cause of death in the world and a leading cause of serious disability. We team with millions of volunteers to fund innovative research, fight for stronger public health policies and provide lifesaving tools and information to prevent and treat stroke. The Dallas-based association officially launched in 1998 as a division of the American Heart Association. To learn more or to get involved, call 1-888-4STROKE or visit stroke.org. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
For Media Inquiries and AHA/ASA Expert Perspective: 214-706-1173
Karen Astle: 214-706-1392, email@example.com
For Public Inquiries: 1-800-AHA-USA1 (242-8721)