Research Highlights:

  • A high-dose, trivalent influenza vaccine was no more effective than the standard-dose quadrivalent vaccine at reducing the risk of death or hospitalization for heart or lung-related causes among patients with heart disease.
  • While overall there were few serious side effects in both vaccine groups, those who received the high-dose vaccine had more injection-related side effects such as pain, swelling and muscle aches.
  • Researchers did not specifically examine whether one type of vaccine was more effective than the other in reducing flu-related illnesses, although hospitalization rates for influenza were similar between the two groups.

Embargoed until 9:40 a.m. CT/10:40 a.m. ET, Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2020

DALLAS, Nov. 17, 2020 — People with heart disease can receive either the high-dose or standard-dose flu vaccines for protection from heart or lung-related deaths or hospitalizations, according to late breaking research presented today at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2020. The virtual meeting is Friday, November 13 - Tuesday, November 17, 2020, and is a premier global exchange of the latest scientific advancements, research and evidence-based clinical practice updates in cardiovascular science for health care worldwide.

People with heart disease are at increased risk for complications from influenza, including heart attacks, hospitalizations for heart failure and death. Researchers for the Influenza Vaccine to Effectively Stop Cardio Thoracic Events and Decompensated Heart Failure (INVESTED) study, funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, set out to evaluate whether a higher dose flu vaccine offered more protection against those complications, compared to a standard-dose flu vaccine. The high-dose vaccine is currently approved in the United States for people ages 65 or older and has been shown to reduce the incidence of influenza infection in these patients. 

“Since people with chronic conditions have been shown to exhibit reduced immune responses to the flu vaccine, we conducted a trial to determine if a higher dosage would overcome the lower response and better protect high-risk individuals,” said Orly Vardeny, Pharm.D., M.S., lead researcher of the study and an associate professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School and in the College of Pharmacy in Minneapolis. “We found that the higher dose influenza vaccine was not more effective than the standard dose in lowering the risk of death or hospitalizations from heart or lung-related illnesses.”

INVESTED is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial that enrolled more than 5,000 (5,260) participants across 157 clinical sites in the U.S. and Canada. Eligible participants had a recent heart attack or were hospitalized for heart failure in the previous two years. They also had at least one additional risk factor such as kidney disease, diabetes, stroke, peripheral artery disease, a weak heart muscle or current use of tobacco.

Researchers randomized participants equally to receive either a high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine, which contained higher doses but only three strains of the inactive flu virus, or a standard-dose, quadrivalent vaccine including four strains of influenza. Participants could remain in the study for up to three years, between the 2016 and 2019 flu seasons, and received the same type of vaccine each year they were in the study. There was no difference in the rates of mortality or hospitalizations for cardiac or pulmonary causes between vaccine formulations (44.5 per 100 patient years for those who received the high-dose vaccine, compared with 41.9 per 100 patient years for those who received standard-dose).

“There are several possible explanations for our findings. First, we enrolled people at high risk for heart and lung-related hospitalizations, and there were many of these types of hospitalizations during the trial. However, only a small number of those hospitalizations were identified as caused by influenza,” said Vardeny who is also a core investigator with the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research at the Minneapolis VA Health System. “It is possible that since all participants received the flu vaccine, both formulations similarly reduced the risk for heart and lung hospitalizations. Another possibility is that since participants were already at a very high risk for hospitalization due to their pre-existing heart conditions, and most of the hospitalizations were not attributable to influenza, the incremental benefit of one vaccine over the other would not have overcome the high underlying risk in this population.” 

She also noted it is possible that the extra influenza strain present in the standard-dose vaccine might have offset the benefit of the higher dose.

Researchers did not collect information on how many participants became sick with the flu, so they do not know if the higher dose of the vaccine reduced overall flu infections more than the standard dose in study participants.

Vardeny said future research should examine whether other types of the flu vaccine may be more protective for patients with high-risk conditions or whether the high-dose vaccine is more effective in low-risk cardiac patients.

“Most importantly, these data don’t detract from the extremely strong recommendation that all patients with heart disease get vaccinated for influenza. This is especially the case this year, when influenza will be co-circulating with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19,” Vardeny said. “Our study showed that vaccine dose may not be as important as getting vaccinated.”

Co-authors are KyungMann Kim, Ph.D.; Jacob A Udell, M.D., M.P.H.; Jacob Joseph, M.D.; Adrian F. Hernandez, M.D., M.H.S.; H. Keipp Talbot, M.D., M.P.H.; Michael E. Farkouh, M.D.; Lawton S. Cooper, M.D.; and Scott Solomon, M.D. Author disclosures are in the abstract. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funded the study. Additional funding and vaccine were provided by Sanofi-Pasteur who were not involved in the design, conduct or interpretation of the trial results.

Note: LBS.08 - AHA Goes Viral: COVID-19, Influenza Vaccines, and Cardiovascular Disease

Additional Resources:

Statements and conclusions of studies that are presented at the American Heart Association’s scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association’s policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, device manufacturers and health insurance providers are available here, and the Association’s overall financial information is available here

About the American Heart Association

The American Heart Association is a leading force for a world of longer, healthier lives. With nearly a century of lifesaving work, the Dallas-based association is dedicated to ensuring equitable health for all. We are a trustworthy source empowering people to improve their heart health, brain health and well-being. We collaborate with numerous organizations and millions of volunteers to fund innovative research, advocate for stronger public health policies, and share lifesaving resources and information. Connect with us on, Facebook, Twitter or by calling 1-800-AHA-USA1.


For Media Inquiries and AHA Expert Perspective:

AHA News Media in Dallas: 214-706-1173;

For Public Inquiries: 1-800-AHA-USA1 (242-8721) and