Alternative therapy produces intriguing results in some heart patients but many questions remain
American Heart Association Late-Breaking Clinical Trial Report - Embargoed until 4:36 p.m. PT/ 7:36 p.m. ET
November 04, 2012
- Patients with prior heart attacks enrolled in a clinical trial of a weekly chelation infusion regiment that included disodium EDTA and vitamin C had fewer cardiovascular disease complications than those who received placebo infusions.
- Chelation therapy removes heavy metals like lead and iron from the body. Disodium EDTA, the agent used in the study, does not have an FDA indication.
- Investigators caution that the results need to be reproduced and understood before consideration of clinical application.
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 4, 2012 — Heart attack
patients given weekly infusions of chemicals used for chelation therapy had fewer cardiovascular events than those who received identical appearing placebo infusions, according to late-breaking clinical trial results presented at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2012.
In the multicenter, double-blind efficacy trial, Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT), 1,708 heart attack patients were randomized to receive 40 infusions of a 500 mL chelation solution or a placebo infusion, with a second randomization to an oral vitamin and mineral regimen or an oral placebo. The chelation solution contained three grams of the synthetic amino acid ethylene diamine tetra-acetic (EDTA), seven grams of vitamin C, B-vitamins, electrolytes, a local anesthetic and heparin, an anti-clotting drug. The placebo infusion was salt water and a small amount of sugar.
Researchers found that patients receiving the chelation solution had fewer serious cardiovascular events than the control group (26 percent vs. 30 percent). Cardiovascular events were defined as death, heart attack, stroke, coronary revascularization and hospitalization for angina.
Although participants with diabetes appeared to have a particular benefit from the infusions, the study team cautioned that subgroup analyses can be unreliable and need to be reproduced.
Chelation therapy is used to remove metals from the bloodstream. The more common calcium EDTA is approved to treat lead poisoning and other chelation drugs are used to manage iron overload following repeated blood transfusions. The study used the less common disodium EDTA and the infusion regimen contained other components including vitamin C.
There has been decades-long debate about whether chelation therapy could be effective as a treatment for patients with atherosclerosis, or fatty deposits in arteries that can cause heart attacks. Until now, there have been no large, long-term clinical trials to determine if these intravenous infusions might work for patients with coronary artery disease.
“We have to look carefully at these unexpected results,” said Gervasio A. (Tony) Lamas, M.D., lead author of the study and chief of Columbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Fla. “Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating heart disease, chelation therapy has been used for over 50 years and has generally been believed by conventional medical practitioners and cardiologists to be without value. A definitive answer on chelation therapy will take much additional research. The most exciting part of this study is that there may be an unexpected signal of benefit. We need to understand whether the signal is true, or whether it occurred by chance.”
The patients in the trial were 82 percent male, 94 percent Caucasian and about half were obese. All had experienced a previous heart attack, 83 percent had already had bypass surgery, stent implantation or balloon angioplasty. Thirty-two percent had diabetes, 68 percent had high blood pressure and 73 percent had been prescribed cholesterol-lowering statins. Patients were followed for an average of 55 months.
The trial was conducted in 134 sites in the United States and Canada from 2002-2011.
“The chelation therapy was an arduous regimen,” Lamas said.
Each patient received 40 infusions, each lasting at least three hours. The first 30 infusions were one week apart. The last 10 were two weeks to two months apart depending on the patient’s schedule. All told, researchers delivered 55,222 infusions.
Lamas said there is still much work to do before the treatment would be considered standard.
“This is a one-of-a-kind study, so we do not know if the effect will be reproducible,” he said. “The level of statistical difference between groups was small.”
A stringent safety infrastructure made sure patients experienced no undue risk. In addition, the research team worked with a central pharmacy to ensure the safety and purity of the infused products and had in place a computerized system that calculated doses based on the patient’s kidney function and the system sent an alert if an infusion was completed faster than usual.
“Unless we can show a consistent effect across studies, understand why this treatment might work and establish a similar mechanism to deliver the treatment safely, it will be difficult for chelation to enter the mainstream of other cardiovascular therapies,” Lamas said.
“The American Heart Association applauds the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine for sponsoring this study and the investigators for performing a trial that was difficult to conduct,” said Elliott Antman, M.D., chair of the AHA Scientific Sessions Program Committee, cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Mass. “Intriguing as the results are, they are unexpected and should not be interpreted as an indication to adopt chelation therapy into clinical practice.”
“More information is needed about which elements of the complex infusion mixture might provide benefit, the marked differences between the observed treatment effect in diabetics versus non-diabetics needs to be understood and we need to be sure that the findings can be replicated. Like many trials, TACT raises more questions that must be answered before we’re ready to act on the observations reported today,” he said.
Co-authors are Christine Goertz, D.C., Ph.D.; Robin Boineau, M.D., M.A.; Daniel B. Mark, M.D.; M.P.H.; Theodore Rozema, M.D.; Richard L. Nahin, Ph.D., M.P.H.; Yves Rosenberg M.D.; Mario Stylianou, Ph.D.; Jeanne Drisko, M.D.; and Kerry L. Lee, Ph.D.
The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funded the study.
Follow news from the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2012 via Twitter: #AHANews2012.
Statements and conclusions of study authors that are presented at American Heart Association scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect association policy or position. The association makes no representation or warranty as to their accuracy or reliability. The association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific association programs and events. The association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and device corporations are available at www.heart.org/corporatefunding
Note: The TACT presentation is 4:36 p.m. PT, Sunday, Nov. 4 in Hall G.
For Media Inquiries:
AHA News Media in Dallas: (214) 706-1173
AHA News Media Office, Nov. 3-7,
at the Los Angeles Convention Center: (213) 743-6205
For Public Inquiries: (800) AHA-USA1 (242-8721)