Research Highlights:

  • The brain’s reaction to stress could be an important indicator of angina (chest pain) among people with known heart disease.
  • The effects of psychological stress on brain activity could potentially impact the severity of angina long after the stressful event has occurred.
  • Activity in the inferior frontal lobe of the brain and psychological stress factors explained angina severity better than traditional risk factors. 

Embargoed until 4 a.m. CT/5 a.m. ET Monday, August 10, 2020                                                                                                                   

DALLAS, August 10, 2020 — Stress-induced activity in the inferior frontal lobe of the brain may have a direct correlation with chest pain among people with coronary artery disease, according to new research released today in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, an American Heart Association journal.

Angina pectoris, or stable angina, is chest pain or discomfort due to inadequate blood flow to the heart. Angina occurs due to coronary artery disease, and, while recent research has indicated psychological factors including mental stress can lead to angina, little is known about the brain mechanisms involved. This study was designed to measure how activity in the inferior frontal lobe of the brain – the area of the brain associated with emotional regulation and stress – affects the severity of self-reported angina.

“Our study sought to understand the degree to which health care providers should incorporate stress and other psychological factors when evaluating and treating angina,” said lead investigator Amit J. Shah, M.D., M.S.C.R., assistant professor of epidemiology at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health in Atlanta. “Although brain imaging during a mental stress challenge is not a test that can be ordered in clinical settings, the study shows an important proof-of-concept that shows the brain’s reactivity to stress is an important consideration when considering angina treatment.”

A total of 148 people with coronary artery disease participated in the study from 2011 to 2014. The study participants were, on average, 62 years old, and consisted of 69% men and 31% women. The group underwent testing of mentally stressful events in a clinical setting and had brain imaging and cardiac imaging conducted in conjunction with the tests.

Participants were assessed with three tests that were performed over a two-week period: a mental stress test with brain imaging; a mental stress test with heart imaging; and an exercise or chemical stress test with heart imaging. During these tests, the researchers monitored participants for chest pain. Additional questionnaires for chest pain and cardiovascular events were assessed after two years.

Investigators examined factors related to the severity of the participants’ angina and observed that brain activity in the inferior frontal lobe showed the strongest relationship with self-reported angina at baseline and also at a two-year follow-up appointment. The results indicated that:

  • participants who reported having monthly, weekly or daily angina symptoms had higher inferior frontal lobe activity in response to mental stress at both baseline;
  • those who reported angina during mental stress testing with cardiac imaging also had higher inferior frontal lobe activation compared to individuals who did not have active chest pain during mental stress testing; and
  • there was a significant association between inferior frontal lobe activation during stress and the degree of change in angina frequency at the two-year follow-up, suggesting that brain-related changes might predict worsened future angina.

“We were surprised by the strength of the relationship between the level of activity in this brain region and the frequency of chest pain reported, as well as the lack of a relationship to factors that are normally considered important when treating angina, such as heart imaging,” said Shah. “The top three factors that explained angina frequency were all stress related, including brain activation, depressive symptoms and PTSD symptoms. This is surprising because when we manage angina in clinical settings, we normally do not consider stress as an underlying factor, and rather focus on blood flow in the heart.”

The authors note the study did have some limitations in that the testing protocols may not reflect real-life stressors, potentially leading to an underestimation of the role stress plays on angina. They also point out the angina questionnaire was answered retrospectively by participants, as opposed to a diary-style log, yet this method of information gathering is not unusual during clinical trials. Additionally, the associations they found suggest but do not prove a cause-and-effect relationship between brain stress reactivity and angina.

Co-authors are Kasra Moazzami, M.D., M.P.H.; Matthew T. Wittbrodt, Ph.D.; Mhmtjamil Alkhalaf, M.D.; Bruno B. Lima, M.D., Ph.D.; Jonathon A. Nye, Ph.D.; Puja K. Mehta, M.D., FAHA; Arshed A. Quyyumi, M.D.; Viola Vaccarino, M.D., Ph.D.; and J. Douglas Bremner, M.D. Author disclosures are in the manuscript.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health.

Additional Resources:

Statements and conclusions of study authors published in American Heart Association scientific journals are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association’s policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and device corporations and health insurance providers are available at

About the American Heart Association

The American Heart Association is a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives. We are dedicated to ensuring equitable health in all communities. Through collaboration with numerous organizations, and powered by millions of volunteers, we fund innovative research, advocate for the public’s health and share lifesaving resources. The Dallas-based organization has been a leading source of health information for nearly a century. Connect with us on, Facebook, Twitter or by calling 1-800-AHA-USA1.


For Media Inquiries and AHA/ASA Expert Perspective: 214-706-1173

William Westmoreland: 214-706-1232,

For Public Inquiries: 1-800-AHA-USA1 (242-8721) and